صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

of the prelate elect, 289.
king's mandate for conse-
cration, its antiquity, ibid.
oaths of supremacy, and of
canonical obedience, 290,
291. oath of submission to
the Roman pontiff formerly
taken, was not of ancient
date, ibid. the litany, 292,
293. examination of the pre-
late elect, 293-295. the
hymn Veni Creator, 296, the
form of consecration, 296
-298. remainder of the of-
fice, 299. ceremony of lay-
ing the gospels on the head
of the bishop ordained, not
universally used, ibid.
Bishops, election and confirma-
tion of, ii. 287.
Bread for the eucharist, how it
may be prepared, ii. 77.
Breaking of bread in the eu-
charist, its origin, ii. 144.
times at which it is broken,
144, 145. after consecration
from St. Paul, ibid.

Breviary, from what it was
composed in the eleventh
century, i. 208.

BRITAIN, bishops of, proved to
have divine mission, and to
be the successors of the apo-
stles, ii. 248, &c.

church of, its early
history obscure, i. 176. its
bishops probably first or-
dained in Gaul, 179, 180.
its antiquity, ii. 250, 251.
never committed schism,
nor was separated from the
catholic church, 255. its bi-
shops have always transmit-
ted apostolical mission, 255,
256. it was not within any
patriarchate, 260, 266. did
not lose its rights by the
conversion of the Saxons,
261-263. our rights esta-

blished by the councils of
Nice and Ephesus, 263. and
justly resumed in the time
of Henry the Eighth, 264.
and in force ever since, 265,
&c.

BRITAIN, liturgy of, opinion of
archbishop Usher, &c. as to
its nature considered, i. 176.
it differed greatly from the
Roman, 178. and from the
Irish, ibid. the nature of this
liturgy inferred from facts,
179, 180.

Burial of the dead, ancient
customs of the church, ii.
232. originals and antiquities
of our burial service, 233-
237.
Byzantium, see Constantinople.
Cæsarea, exarchate of, its ex-
tent, i. 45.

liturgy of, see BASIL.
Canon of the Roman liturgy,
what, i. 111. its text to be
ascertained as it was in the
time of Gregory the Great,
112. not composed after the
time of Vigilius, 113. al-
luded to by him, 115. see
Rome, liturgy of.

Cantate Domino, used in even-
ing prayer, i. 256.
Cappa, see Cope.
Caps, square, used in the uni-
versities and by the clergy,
ii. 321.
Caputium, ii. 320.
Casula, ii. 309.
Catalogues of bishops in Britain
and Ireland. ii. 249.
Catechumens, prayers made for
them in the communion ser-
vice anciently, ii. 66.

whether there were
prayers for them in the Gal-
lican liturgy, i. 108, 160.
Catharinus, archbishop of Con-
za, did not hold the doc-

trine of intention, ii. 10,

11.

Cave, his mistake with regard
to the Syrian liturgy of Ba-
sil, i. 48.

Chasible, see Vestment.
Cherubic hymn used in Greek
liturgies, when introduced,
i. 94.

Childbirth, thanksgiving of wo-
men after it, ii. 238. ori-
ginals of our office, ibid.
Chimere, used by the British
bishops, ii. 318. its deriva-
tion, 319.

Chrism, its antiquity in con-
firmation, ii. 199.
CHRYSOSTOM, St., liturgyof, used
in patriarchate of Constan-
tinople, i. 73. its appellation
of doubtful antiquity, ibid.
tract ascribed to Proclus no
sufficient authority, 73, 74,
194. text of this liturgy con-
sidered uncertain by critics,
75. replies to their objec-
tions, 76, 77. referred to by
Severianus of Gabala, and
Chrysostom, 78, 79. proba-
bly used in Thrace, Mace-
donia, and Greece, from
time immemorial, 79. ob-
servations on the antiquity
of the great oriental liturgy,
80.

prayer of his at
the end of morning and
evening prayers, i. 249,
262.

Church militant, prayers for it
in the communion office con-
sidered, ii. 87, &c. their po-
sition justified, 98.
CLEMENT, St., liturgy of, re-
marks on its antiquity, i.
37,40.

Collect for purity at the begin-
ning of the communion ser-
vice, its antiquity, ii. 23, 24.

its original text, 26.
Collectarium, what, i. 207.
Collects in matins, their position
ancient, i. 242. their origin
traced, 242-244. collect for
the day, 245. for peace, how
old, its original text, 245.
for grace, its antiquity and
original text, 246. for the
king and royal family, 247,
248. for the clergy and peo-
ple, its antiquity and ori-
ginal text, 248, 249. of St.
Chrysostom, its original text,
249, 250.

in evening prayer, 260,
261. for peace, 261. for
grace, 262. concluding col-
lects, 262, 263.

in the liturgy, in what
churches they are used, 309.
ancient in the Alexandrian
and western liturgies, 310.
whether they varied with
each celebration of the li-
turgy, 311, 312. antiquity
of the collects in the English
liturgy, 313, 314. ii. 35.
their original text from the
ancient sacramentaries, 317,
&c.

in the communion ser-
vice, ii. 35. for the king, 36.
justified from antiquity, 37,
38. for the day how old, 39,
40. their number, 40. occa-
sional collects, ibid. their
antiquity, 41.
Colobium, see Tunicle.
Comes, what it was, i. 308. ii. 44.
Commandments, Ten, see Law.
Commemoration of our Saviour's
institution of the eucharist,
see Institution.

Commination service on the first
day of Lent, its origin and
antiquity, ii. 240, 241. ori-
ginals of the service, 241-
245.

Communion of the clergy and
laity according to the British
church justified, ii. 151. dis-
tributed in both kinds by
the eastern church, ibid. cor-
ruption in the west, 152.
place of communion, ibid.
communion anthems, 153.
forms of delivery, ibid. of
the sick, 229. the prac-
tice of the church of Eng-
land in this justified, 229,
230. ancient rubric of the
church, for the consolation
of those who cannot com-
municate, 230, 231.
Compline, an hour of prayer,
its origin, i. 204.
Confession, in morning prayer
justified by practice of the
eastern church, i. 212, 213.
its antiquity in the west,
213, 214. in the evening
prayer, its antiquity, 252.
in the communion service,
formerly made in silence, ii.
104. its position and use
justified from ancient litur-
gies, 105. its substance com-
pared with that of some an-
cient formularies, 106, 107.
private in the liturgy, i. 122.
Confirmation, when administer-
ed in primitive times, ii.
198, 199. different customs
of the east and west, ibid.
antiquity of chrism, ibid.
different modes of laying on
hands, 200, 201. English
office of confirmation, 202,
&c. invocation of the Holy
Spirit, 203. imposition of
hands, 204. conclusion of
the office, 205-207.

Consecration, in the English li-
turgy objected to by Ro-
manists, and proved to be
valid, ii. 9, &c. prayer of,
in the English liturgy how

divided, 134. its form in
different churches varied,
135. eastern and Roman
forms, ibid. invocation of
the Holy Ghost how preva-
lent, 136. proved not to be
essential, from practice of
Roman and Italian churches,
ibid. for other reasons, 138.
English prayer of consecra-
tion examined and proved
to be perfectly valid, 139,
140. such a prayer neces-
sary, 141. in the Gallican
liturgy, considerations as to
its form, i. 163, &c.
Constantinople, liturgy of, see
CHRYSOSTOм.
Constantinopolitan Creed, its ori-
gin, ii. 53. when first used
in the liturgy, 54. its posi-
tion, 55. its original text,
56, 57.

Cope, what it was originally,
ii. 312. its shape and mate-
rials, 313. when prescribed
by the English ritual, ibid.
worn instead of the chasible
in the east, 314.

Coptic liturgies, i. 82. at what
seasons used, 83. language,
anciently used in divine ser-
vice, 83, 84.

Creed, Constantinopolitan, used
in the ancient Spanish li-
turgy, i. 175.

Cross, sign of the, how an-
ciently used by Christians,
ii. 190.

CYRIL ALEXANDRINUS, liturgy
of, in Coptic, used by mo-
nophysites of Alexandria, i.
82, 83. probably written in
Greek at first, 83. divine
service performed in Coptic
from the earliest ages, 83,
84. this liturgy represents
the original Alexandrian rite,
85. proved from St. Mark's

liturgy, 85, 86. proved from
the Ethiopic liturgy, 89. the
Ethiopic liturgy enables us
to trace the order of Cyril's
liturgy to the time of Atha-
nasius, 90, 91. differences
between Cyril's and Mark's
liturgies accounted for, 92,
&c. comparison between Cy-
ril's, Mark's, and the Ethio-
pic liturgy, establishing the
primitive Alexandrian order,
97-99. further comparison
with the writings of Egypt-
ian fathers, 100-103. See
St. MARK.

Dalmatic, see Tunicle.

Egyptian liturgy, peculiarities
of it, i. 98, 99. See MARK.
CYRIL.

Elements for the eucharist, when
placed on the holy table, ii.
74. custom of the eastern
church, ibid. water mixed
with the wine not essential,
75, 76. bread how to be
prepared, 77.

Elevation of the eucharist not
practised by the English
church, ii. 16.

Deacons, their office in the li-
turgy during the primitive
ages, ii. 104. ordinations of,
in the English ritual, 300,
306.

Dead, prayers for the, in the
liturgy very ancient, ii. 94.
British church justified for
removing them from her

ENGLAND, liturgy of, after the
time of Augustine, i. 185,
186. origin of the "uses"
of York, Sarum, &c., 186.
remarks on the ritual books
of York and Hereford, ibid.
Sarum, use, whence derived,
ibid. extensive prevalence
of this rite, 187. origin of a
title of the bishop of Sarum,
ibid. Lincoln and Bangor
uses, ibid. Aberdeen in Scot-
land, its rites, 188. various

public offices, 95-97.

Decalogue, see Law.
Decentius of Eugubium, letter
to him from Innocentius, i.
118.

Diocese, civil, explained, i. 6, 7.
how governed, 7. how many
in the Roman empire, ibid.
Diptychs in the Gallican litur-
gy, i. 160.

Discipline, secret, what it was,
i. 14. its influence on the
language of the fathers, ibid.
Dissenters, their objection to
the English ritual, as derived
from the Roman, met, ii. I,
&c.

Egypt, ancient customs of
psalmody there, i. 243. or-
thodox of, their liturgy of
St. Mark altered to suit the
Constantinopolitanrite, why,

monastic rites noticed, ibid.
missal of Evesham, ibid. of

193.

Oxford, ibid. all these rites
differed but little, ibid. Eng-
lish ritual as now used, 188,
189. ritual of, is invested
with canonical and spiritual
authority, ii. 3-8. calum-
nies against it, 9.
EPHESUS, exarchate of, its ex-
tent, i. 106. when it became
subject to the patriarch of
Constantinople, ibid. its li-
turgies, ibid. conjectures as
to the cause of the nine-
teenth canon of the coun-
cil of Laodicea, ibid. this
canon seems to appoint an
order similar to that now
used, 107, 108. reasons for
thinking the Gallican liturgy
formerly prevailed in this
exarchate, 108-110. Dif-

ferences between the great
oriental and the Gallican
liturgies, 109.

Epistle in the English liturgy,
ii. 42. where anciently read,
43. corner where it was
read how entitled, ibid.

Epistles, used in the English li-
turgy, their antiquity, i. 3 14,
&c. traced in the ancient
Lectionaries, 317, &c.
Epistoler, what, ii. 44.
Espousals, what, ii. 211.
ETHIOPIA, when converted to
Christianity, i. 89. liturgy
of, originally derived from
that of Alexandria, ibid.
where found, ibid. was an
independent liturgy from the
beginning, 89, 90. what it
omits, 90. its use in tracing
the ancient Alexandrian rites,
91. comparison with Mark's
and Cyril's liturgy establish-
ing primitive Alexandrian
rite, 100-103. See MARK,
CYRIL.

Eucharist, why the liturgy and
the sacred elements were
called so by the fathers, ii.
113. the liturgy called so
by St. Paul, 114, &c.

Eulogiæ, or blessed bread, what,
ii. 154.

Evening prayers of the British
church, or evensong, whence
derived, i. 206, 253. See
Vespers.

Evesham, missal belonging to
the monastery there, i. 188.
Exarch, meaning of the term,
i. 6.

Exhortation, in the morning
and evening prayers justi-
fied, i. 211, 252. in the
communion service defend-
ed, ii. 99, 100.
Expulsion of bishops by queen
Elizabeth justified, ii. 279.

the church has always di-
rected bishops to be ordain-
ed to sees vacant de facto
by the acts of kings, 280,
281. reasons for expelling
queen Mary's bishops, 281
-285.

Festivalis liber, what, ii. 65.
Forum Julii, liturgy used there,
i. 132.

Frumentius, converted the E-
thiopians, i. 89. was or-
dained bishop by Athana-
sius, ibid.

GAUL, liturgy of, by whom
elucidated, i. 143, 158. who
were the authors of the Gal-
lican missal, 143, 144. the
liturgy was different from
the Roman, 144. was ex-
changed for it by means of
Pepin and Charlemagne, 145.
was more ancient than the
time of Hilary of Poictiers,
146-148. and originally
derived from the church
of Lyons, 148, &c. Lyons
the oldest church in Gaul,
149, 150. sent missionaries
through a large part of Gaul,
151. the Roman mission-
aries in the third century
must have adopted the li-
turgy of Lyons, 152, 153.
this liturgy derived from the
churches of Asia and the
tradition of St. John the
apostle, 153, 154. testimony
of the British and Irish
churches to this effect, 155
-157. argument for the
apostolical antiquity of this
liturgy, 157. its order and
substance stated, 158, &c.
what liturgy it chiefly re-
sembled, 163. difficulty with
regard to the form of con-
secration, ibid. invocation
of the Holy Ghost originally

« السابقةمتابعة »