صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

Mr. Hill's faint attempt to show, that his Scheme
differs from speculative Antinomianism: His incon-
sistency in pleading for and against Sin, is illustrated
by Judah's behaviour to Tamar.

At Mr. Hill's special request, Mr. Fulsome, (a gross
Antinomian, first introduced to the world by Mr.
Berridge,) is brought upon the stage of controversy.
Mr. Berridge attempts in vain to bind him with
Calvinistic cords.

Mr. Hill cannot defend his Doctrines of Grace before
the judicious, by producing a List of the gross
Antinomians that may be found in Mr. Wesley's
Societies.

SECTION VI.

Mr. Hill, after passing over the Arguments and Scrip-
tures of the Fourth Check, attacks an Illustration
with the Ninth Article. His stroke is warded off,
and that Article turned against Calvinism.

His Moral Creed about Faith and Works, is incompa-
tible with his Immoral System.

He raises a cloud of dust about a fair, though abridged,
quotation from Dr. Owen; and in his eagerness to
charge Mr. Wesley and his second with disingenuity,
furnishes them with weapons against his own errors.

The sincerity of our Lord's Intercession, even for Judas,
is defended.

An Answer to two capital Charges of gross Misrepre-
sentation.

Some Queries concerning Mr. Hill's forwardness to
accuse his Opponents of disingenuity, gross perver-
sion, calumny, forgery, &c. and concerning his abrupt
manner of quitting the field of Controversy.

The Author, after professing his brotherly love and
respect for all pious Calvinists, apologizes for his An-
tagonist before the Anti-Calvinists; and,

In the Appendix, the Author proves by ten more Ar..
guments, the absurdity of supposing, with the Solifi-
dians, that Believers are justified by Works before
Men and Angels, but not before God.

AN ANSWER

TO THE

FINISHING STROKE

OF

RICHARD HILL, ESQ.

HON. AND DEAR SIR,

I HAVE received your Finishing Stroke, and return the following Answer; to you, or, if you have quitted the field, to your pious second, the Rev. Mr. Berridge, who, by a public attack upon sincere obedience, and upon the doctrine of a believer's Justification by Works, and not by Faith only, has already entered the lists in your place.

Sect. 1. page 6. You complain, that I represent you as fighting the battles of the rankest Antinomians, "Because (say you) we firmly believe and unanimously assert, that the blood of Christ cleanseth from all sin,' and that, if any man sin, we have an Advocate with the Father,' &c., and that this advocacy prevails." Not so, dear Sir; I apprehend you give your readers totally wrong ideas of the question. You know, I

[ocr errors]
« السابقةمتابعة »