صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

self. I went to meeting and heard the three sermons, which were

preached on that day. I was prepared to hear with attention, expecting to learn what I might do. In the improvement of the morning discourse I was told to do my duty, if I remember right, without regard to consequences. This thought immediately occurred to me, who can tell me what my duty is? I asked myself, if I were willing, that Jesus Christ should be my teacher and do for me and direct me in every respect. I thought I was. The character of God, as exhibited in the second sermon, appeared pleasing. I was glad, that God was a being, possessing all power. I had seen enough of my own heart to convince me, that all, which was said in the third sermon concerning the nat ural depravity of man was true.

While I was meditating upon recollect of applying them to mymy unhappy situation, the thought occurred to me, why not commit my ways unto the Lord, rest in him and wait patiently for him. I felt that I could willingly do it. I wished to be made entirely holy. And I was desirous of entering immediately into God's service. I asked myself, if I were willing, after enjoying his presence here, to be cast from it for ever. I shrunk from it. The thought returned, am I not willing God's will should be done? I thought I could cheerfully commit my all into his hands, leaving the event with him. My proud heart quickly suggested to me, that these feelings were right. The thought distressed me. I mentally said what can be done with such a heart as mine? I took up the bible and opening to the 10th chapter of Acts, I read these words, "he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do." Who, thought 1, can tell me what I ought to do? My mind was immediately directed to you, sir. You had been the means of convincing me, that I had not taken one step towards heaven. I thought, perhaps, you would now tell me, how I might. I soon found I made great dependance upon it. I felt in haste to go to meeting. It being early, I again took my Bible and opened to the 22d chapter of Luke. I read with indifference, until I came to the 31 & 32 verses.

My heart was affected. I thought

them gracious words, but do not

Meditating one day that week upon my own feelings, while sitting under your preaching, the letter, which I had addressed to you, Sir, three years and an half before, rushed into my mind. I had not thought of it for many months.--It gave me pleasure to think it were possible you had received it and that your prayers were answered in regard to me. J recollected, that I resolved when 1 wrote the letter, that if ever I had the least hope, that I was reconciled to the will of God, I would make you, Sir, acquainted with it. But I scarcely knew,

that I had any; and I was altoge

ther at a loss to know how to express it. The feelings that I have had, that I hoped were right, have been so few, so faint, and of so short continuance, that I know not, whether I am the friend or the enemy of God. I feel none of that opposition, which I formerly had to the divine government; but I cannot determine, whether it is resignation or stupidity. If I have ever been the subject of your prayers, Sir, I beg the continuance of them; if not, may I now be particularly remembered. Begging your pardon, Sir, for the liberty I have taken, I subscribe myself with sentiments of respect, yours,

SOPHIA BULLock.

As the person who wrote the preceding letter has been a number of years in the world of spirits and was greatly endeared to her christian acquaintance, as well as to her bereaved relatives, it has been thought proper to add her name; that her letter may appear and be known, as it was written by her own hand. The letter that she sent to the Post-Office, was received and was prob. ably as trying to him who received it, as the occasion of it was to the writer. The writer was unknown, until the reception of the preceding letter. May every reader pray with humility and perseverance for distressed, and perishing sinners.

T. W.

From the Utica Repository.

THE PILGRIM'S PROGRESS IN THE NINE-
TEENTH CENTURY-BY BUNYANUS.

CHAPTER IV.

Now I beheld that the pilgrims had arrived at the house of the interpreter, where they knocked, and one opened the door, and inquired who they were, and what they wanted. Then Thoughtful told him they were pilgrims who entered this way at the Wicket gate, and were bid to call at the house of the Interpreter, to be more fully introduced into the King's statutes. So they were desired to walk in, and were introduced into the presence of the Interpreter, a venerable old man, of a grave but pleasant countenance, who desired them to be seated, and then inquired who they were, and how they had come in at the gate, and what they had met with by the way; Then he said, and they told him.

In.. You did well in not exchanging your books with Mr. Plausible. He is an impostor, and an enemy to pilgrims; and by good words and fair speeches he deceiveth the hearts of the simple. He knows that none are approved but such by the Lord of the way, as love his statutes, and obey them. He desires, therefore, to keep them ignorant of these, or to make them believe they are different from what they are. For this purpose he wishes to deprive them of their books, or destroy their confidence in them. And if

Ardent. I confess that I was too much inclined to listen to Mr. Plausible, and was disposed to receive his books. But I desire to be thankful that I have escaped the danger.

Th. I wish to know what ground we have to depend upon the correctness of our present copies of the King's statute book, that my confidence in it may not again be shaken; for I confess that Mr. Plausible's discourse made some impression upon my mind also.

he cannot prevail upon him to ced on the King's statute book; take his mutilated and erroneous and thus prepare them to be car. copies, he often fills their minds ried about with every wind of doc. with doubts as to the correctness trine, and become a prey to every of those they have, and greatly deceiver. hinders their improvement and comfort in perusing them. As for his pretended Improved Version, it was indeed made by men of learning and abilities; but they were men who wished to degrade the character of the Prince Immanuel, and rob him of his honors. They wished also to misrepresent the character, and government, and designs of the King, and make it appear that he would not destroy his enemies and burn up their cities with unquenchable fire. His other copies are more or less erroneous, in order to suit the different inclinations of those who may be willing to exchange. That made by John the Itinerant, does not indeed, like some of them degrade the Prince Immanuel to a mere fallible, peccable man, nor deny the existence of the Holy Comforter, nor the everlasting punishment of the King's enemies; but if you should compare it with your own copies, you would perceive that it is intended to conceal many of the doctrines which your copies teach, and to favour those which he laboured to establish; and that it differs from yours in so many places, that its tendency must be to weaken the confidence of the feeble minded in any copy, and make them believe that there is no dependance to be pla

In. As to the correctness of the original copy of which your copies are a translation, I would observe, that the most learned of the King's servants have carefully compared all the copies that could be found in the different parts of the world, and taken down a statement of every variation, even in the manner of spelling the same words, and published the result of their labours; from which it appears, that the copies in present use, cannot differ, in any important particular, from those which were written by the King's scribes. And as to the translation you have, it was the joint labour of forty-seven of the most learned of the King's servants that could be found, in a learned age, and is the copy distributed by all those corporations which the King has

caused to be established for the wider circulation of his statute book, in which corporations are included the most learned of the King's servants now living. So that you may judge yourselves whether there are likely to be any important defects in it. No; whatever Mr. Plausible may pretend, you may depend upon the copy you have, and receive whatever it contains, as the pure word of the King.

Th. I wish to be informed also how I shall know what is the true sense of the King's statute book ; for I find that it is interpreted differently.

In. The most important requisite, in order to arrive at the true sense of the King's statute book, is a humble, teachable disposition. The Prince Immanuel hath said, "If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself." A disobedient heart is the only important difficulty in the way of a right understanding of the King's book. If you feel your own ignorance, and are willing to be taught by the King, and to receive and obey whatever he teaches, without murmurings and disputings, you will be likely to find no difficulty. Th. But I have heard it alleged, that the King's statute book is very dark and difficult to be understood; and that is in vain for persons of common understanding to try to know what it means.

In. That is the language of those who are too indolent to search, or who are disposed to disobey. Remember, that it is a revelation from the King, not merely for the use of the learned, but for those of common understanding also. It is an impeachment of his wisdom and goodness to suppose it is not well adapted to answer the purposes for which it was given.

Th. By what rules of interpretation shall I determine what is the true sense of any passage?

In. By the same rules that you determine what is the true sense of any thing that is said to you. Consider the connexion, and what is the subject of discourse, and let words be understood according to their plainest and most obvious import when used in such a con

nexion.

Th. Are not the same expressions used sometimes figuratively, and sometimes literally?

In. Yes: But the connexion will always decide. If they are used figuratively, the connexion will make it manifest; and it will show also what is the meaning of the figure. If the connexion furnishes no reason why the expression should be understood figuratively, it ought to be understood literally. You must not think you may understand an expression figuratively or literally at your pleasure. This would destroy the use of the King's book altogether,

and make every man's own fancy his rule.

[ocr errors]

Th. I have heard it alleged also that some universal terms, such as all, every, forever, everlasting, are some times used in a limited, and sometimes in an unlimited sense. How shall I know which sense to attach to them.

In. All words which have an unlimited sense, ought to be understood in that sense, unless there is something in the connection which plainly fixes a limitation. Th. How is it then that the advocates of error often seem to have so much from the King's book to support their opinions?

In. Most of the advocates of error believe some truth, as well as some error. They can bring proof from the King's book, to support every truth they believe. And when they wish to oppose any truth, they usually state it wrong, so that it has the appearance of an error; and thus they seem to bring much against it from the King's book. They also wrest what is contained in the King's book, so as to make it seem to bear upon the point in dispute; or they try to keep the point in dispute out of sight, and set up something else, which is a truth, instead of it, and having proved that, they pretend they have gained the point in dispute, when, in reality, they have not touched it at all. By such arts, they often impose upon the credulous and unthinking.

Ard. I trust we shall be disposed to take the King's book for our guide, and embrace whatever it contains. I long to see the rare and profitable sights which pilgrims have formerly seen here.

So the Interpreter took the pilgrims into his significant rooms, and showed them those things which had been seen by the pilgrim Christian, and also those which had been seen by Christiana and her company. After this was done and they had conversed upon them sufficiently, he took them to see other things, which he thought might be profitable to them.

First he took them to the door of a prison where, looking through the grates, they saw a man made fast in irons; and they saw also that the doors of the prison were locked and barred upon him ?— Then there came one who looked through the grates, and called to the man, and bid him come out and offered him a great reward if he would do so. Then said the man why do you mock me? You see I cannot come out, for I am fast bound in chains; and the doors of the prison are closed upon me.Alas I would gladly come out if I could.

Then said the pilgrims, what means this?

In. This shows the absurd conduct of many who teach that the Prince Immanuel died for the elect only, and that all men are under a natural inability to comply with

« السابقةمتابعة »