...held out, tint France was, and mud be, the unalterable enemy of Britain ; an opinion founded neither in the experience of nations, nor in the hiftory of man. It was a libc! ou the conflitution of political focictics,, and fuppofed the exifteoce of diabolical malice...

...unalterably the enemy of another. Jt had no foundation in the experience of nations or the hiflory of men. Jt was a' libel on the conftitution of political focieties, and fuppofed the exiftence of diabolical nr.dice in our original frame. But this abfurd tenet was now adopted ; and it was added, that by this...

...to admire. To fuppofe that any two ftates were neceflarily enemies, was an opinion founded neither in the experience of nations, nor in the hiftory of...diabolical malice in the original frame of man. But after all, what reafon was there to imagine that the treaty was not only to extinguiih all jealoufy...

...neceflarily enemies, was an opinion founded neither in the experience of nations.nor in the hiftoryof man. It was a libel on the conftitution of political focieties. and fuppofed the exifience of diabolical malice in the original frame of man. But after all, what reafon was there to...

...unalterable foe of another. It had no foundation in the experience of nations, or in the hiftory of men. It was a libel on the conftitution of political focieties, and fuppofed the exiftence of infernal malignity in our original •frame. " France (Mr. Pitt faid) in moft of our wars had been...

...away. To fuppofe- that any nation could be unalterably the enemy of another, was weak and childim. It had neither its foundation in the experience of nations, nor in the hiftory of man. It is a libel on the conftitution of political focicties, and fuppofed the exiftence of a diabolical,...

...impossible. To suppose that any natipn could be unalterably the enemy of another, was weak and childish. It had neither its foundation in the experience of nations, nor in the history of man. It was a libel on the constitution of political societies, and supposed the existence...

...impossible. . To suppose that any nation could be unalterably the enemy of another, was weak and childish. It had neither its foundation in the experience of nations, nor in the history of man. It was a libel on the constitution of political societies, and supposed the existence...

...impossible. To suppose that any nation could be unalterably the enemy of another was weak and childish. It had neither its foundation in the experience of nations, nor in the history of man. It was a libel on the constitution of political societies, and supposed the existence...

...impossible. To suppose that any nation was unalterably the enemy of another was weak and childish. It had neither its foundation in the experience of nations nor in the history of man. It was a libel on the constitution of political societies, and supposed diabolical...