m execrable generation through all the world. So that not to be doubted but they would use all possible artito take out this testimony of Josephus, wherever they the management of the copies, either by themselves, thers, their emissaries for that purpose. But it was possible for them to compass the razing it out of all Copies dispersed up and down the world. Besides, this Dus testimony hath the manifest stamp of Josephus's e and diction. Again, we have certain evidence of r testimonies being razed out of Josephus: For Euse(we find) quotes Josephus as recording how just and teous a man James was, called the brother of Christ, saying, that the sober and more considerate men among Jews believed the destruction of Jerusalem to be a punnent inflicted on them for murdering of him. Likewise nave Origen, and Jerom, and Suidas, quoting Josephus he same passage. And yet in our days there is no such age to be found in Josephus. Now, would so many ors have agreed in appealing to Josephus for such a age, if they had not really found it in him? Would it have exposed their cause to the contempt of all the Id, to have asserted a thing which every body could e refuted as false ?

1. Ancient pagan writers have owned the same thing cerning Christ; as Suetonius, Tacitus, Pliny, &c. Yea, ian expressly owns the crucifixion of Christ, though he s both him, and the Christians his worshippers, on that bunt. So doth Julian the appostate; he owns the truth acts concerning Christ, though he endeavours what he to lessen the reputation of his life and miracles, and ges, that all he did was no great matter, but only to the eyes of the blind, restore limbs to the lame, and ver persons possessed from the power and enchantats of devils, which he seemed to make little account of. s true, he doth not notice his raising the dead, but passhat by in silence, being what he could not pretend to wer. The Jews also owned the miracles; but alleged the did all his wonderful works by virtue of the sacred -agrammation. Also Celsus, that enemy of Christianity, fesses the truth of Christ's nativity, his journey into ypt, his passing from place to place with his disciples, fact of his miracles, his being betrayed, and, lastly, his death and passion. I grant they make all these concessions, in order to their scoff and ridicule: However, it shows the things were so evident, they could not be denied; but Origen sufficiently chastises and exposes him for railing.

12. It is certain that the writings of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, concerning the life and actions of Christ and his apostles, were their genuine compositions, and not the writings of any other. To confirm this, consider that there is no reason to doubt, that the first teachers of the Christian faith would use the most effectual means for propagating a doctrine they so zealously espoused themselves, and they would not on that score neglect so direct and necessary a method for obtaining their end, as that of committing their doctrines to writing. This is what may be rationally expected from the policy and care of the first founders of any sect, as being a step so necessary, in order to the preservation and progress thereof. All the sects who have made any figure in the world, have taken this course, and so have the founders of Christianity too. While the autographa, or original manuscripts of these penmen were preserved in the church, there was no access to impose doctrines or facts on the world in their names, contrary to what they had written. And Tertullian, who flourished at the latter end of the second century, or the very beginning of the third, intimates, that these venerable writings were preserved till his time. Again, no particular sects of Christians could ever get the writings of the New Testament so forged or adulterated, but all the other sects of Christians would have proclaimed the imposture to the world. The enmity and quarrels among different parties, were a strong guard on these sacred books, that no designing party could ever foist into these books their own notions, seeing the copies were dispersed among all the

MEDITATION III.

Of the certainty of CHRIST's Resurrection.

WE have many undeniable evidences of it: 1. timony of many eye-witnesses; for, besides the a who were witnesses of it in an eminent manner, the many others: For Paul tells us, that in his time the still remaining the greater part of more than 500, all at one time Jesus see Jesus after his rising again. imposture may lie concealed for a while in a few ha it is next to impossible that it should lie long undis in the hands of a great many. It shocks a man t that so many persons should agree in all the puncti notorious lie, and that they should agree to stand so peremptory a manner as these persons did, an clash together in any instance whatsoever. It is co observed that plots never thrive so well as when t few let into the secret; and large cabals of knaves: seldom fail to tell tales of one another.

2. These witnesses had personal knowledge of w testified: Yea, they not only declared that they sav but many of them, that they saw him frequently miliarly, and that for a considerable tract of time conversed with him for forty days; they ate an with him; they saw him do several wondrous work received orders and instructions from him about the ment of his church; he bid them, "Go, teach and all nations;" he promised them his peace and blo so doing, to the end of the world; he commanded tarry in Jerusalem, till they were endued with pov on high; and a great many other things are record he said to them; and after all, they saw him taken them, and ascend into heaven, angels standing by it never could be a dream or imagination in so ma for so many weeks, to fancy all these things alike, the least variation.

3. Consider the manner of the testimony, and h delivered it. They invoked God's tremendous na begged his assistance and blessing. They appeale

as the omniscient judge of the world, concerning the sincerity and integrity of their hearts. They declared they did not this of themselves, but by God's order and appointment; and that he gave them power of working signs and wonders for the confirmation of all they said; and they accordingly wrought them before all men.

4. They did not testify of a matter that was transacted at a distance from the place where they gave their testimony, nor a long time after the thing was done. No, there is no ground of objection on any of these accounts: For those men appeared upon the very spot that was the scene of the action at Jerusalem, where Christ was crucified, and where they affirmed he also rose. They neither sent people a great way to inquire, nor did they defer the publication of it till Jesus Christ was forgotten, and the story of his resurrection worn out of mind. No, instead of that, they did it while it was fresh in the minds and mouths of all men, and while those persons who could have confuted them were alive, and ready to be produced, if they had any thing to have advanced against it.

5. They did not make a secret of this matter, but declared it in the most public and open mannner that possibly could be. It was not a story whispered among those of their own party, but proclaimed in the ears of all people, and at a time when Jerusalem was crowded with foreigners of all nations, and where was no want of persons able and curious enough to inquire into the truth of all the strange reports they made. They went into the temple and into the synagogues, and preached the resurrection of Christ; yea, in the most august councils of the Jews, they testified it to the rulers and high-priests who had condemned Christ. Peter's bold speech is most remarkable, Acts iv. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. And we see how confounded the whole council was with their testimony; and not one of them had the confidence to tell them that they were publishing a notorious lie.

6. These persons were men of such probity and virtue, that none of their adversaries could ever call in question, nor show to the world that they were ill men.

7. They were persons not bred up in courts, nor instructed in the arts and intrigues of the world, able to persuade

people by elegant discourses, &c. No, they were mean, though plain and honest men, and their d plain and homely: And though Paul was a man learning, yet he would make no use of human le the propagation of Christianity.

8. They could not possibly have any secular preaching such a doctrine to the world: Nay, in p it, they acted against all the rules of worldly int policy, and could have no prospect from the world, was frightful and discouraging; their doctrine bei Jews a stumbling block, and to the Greeks fo They could not propose to themselves either to g tation and esteem, or to advance their fortunes in th nay, suffering the greatest hardships was all the their view.

9. Consider how severe the laws were which lished against lying, forgery, and a false testimony they themselves were guilty of it, they were cond everlasting punishment for what they did, by the trine which they preached. Yet in this doctrine sisted to the last, and if it were a lie, they went world with a horrible lie in their mouths, which is think; for so they could have no hope of finding u forgiveness at God's hands; and thus you would m the most depraved wretches in the world.

10. Now, had they been men who had no relig or sense of God themselves, how is it credible would have been so very zealous and industrious t it upon the minds of others, and to press them to fear him, as the scope of all their writings and do show? How oft do they tell us of a judgment of God's being the searcher of the thoughts and co the heart.

11. It is plain to a demonstration, that thes heartily believed the doctrines they preached to t otherwise, how would they have exposed themselv dangers and sufferings upon that score ?