صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

NOTES ON SECTION V.

The four monarchies frequently and variously symbolized, and
why-Instrumental to religion, and embraced the church of
God-By the four metals in Nebuchadnezzar's image-The
wild beasts in Daniel-The chariots in Zechariah-And also
by the four horses, with them that sat upon them, in the

Apocalypse-These betokened kings and conquerors-And

kings in prophetic nomenclature signify kingdoms or mo-

narchies The Babylonian empire, the head of gold-The

lion, the first chariot, and the white horse, with him that sat

upon him, who went out conquering and to conquer-The

Persian empire the silver-The bear-The second chariot and

the second horse with his rider-The Macedonian or Greek

empire the brass, the leopard, the third chariot with white

horses, and why-The third horse, whose rider had a pair of

balances in his hand-And why-Its justice and equity-

The great civilizer of the world-Promoted the arts-Built

cities-Encouraged commerce-The Roman monarchy-

The iron legs-The terrible monster, the fourth chariot, the
fourth horse, whose rider's name was Death, and killed by
famine and beasts of the earth-The Romans alone of all the
others starved their prisoners, and exposed to wild beasts—
Christians often thrown to them-Lactantius-The residue or
remnant of God's church, the saints-All these kingdoms merge
in the fifth and last kingdom, which will have no end, that
of Christ-And in each case the prophets furnish a rapid
sketch of the world's history-Shewn to St. John as being
under the lion of the tribe of Judah-Head of the church-
The God-man-And governed for its use and benefit, and
farther explained in subsequent visions or prophecies-The
Apocalyse greatly mistaken-And why-The heathen Beast
and the Antichristian or Mahometan Beast, the same Beast;
but in different periods of its history.

Difference between Antichrist and the Beast-Beast, what-An-
cient opinion-Evils of misinterpretation-Map of prophecy
-The fourth beast furnished the early site of Messiah's church

-The ten toes-And ten horns-The ten provincial govern-
ments of the Roman empire-Enumerated by Gibbon-Not
in the West alone, but in both East and WestThe West in
the middle ages-Charlemagne and his successors never ruled
the monarchy with the ten horns or provinces-And if they
had, it would not have been, even in that case, a wild beast
at all, having been professedly Christian, and much less the
wild beast of Daniel and of the Apocalypse-Public profes-
sion, not private character, the object and the field of pro-
phecy-The Pope never ruled all Italy, which was only one
of the horns of the wild beast-The West the barrier against
the wild beast-Who is to continue to the end-Sophism of
Bishop Newton-Conclusion contradicts the premises—The
life and the dominion-The body and the head of the beast
-- Bishop Newton's theory contrary to fact the beast to
continue to the end-Now no beast or Roman empire in the
West-The crimes and the character of the beast different
from those of the Pope, or of the rulers of the West-The
little horn literally and primarily Antiochus, and mysti-
cally and remotely Antichrist-To come when the empire
would be so disturbed and distracted, as to be unable
to let him-Was ultimately to subvert it-Chrysostom-The
ancient or primitive church-The three horns plucked up
by the roots, Egypt, Africa, Syria-The beast of Daniel,
also that of the Apocalypse-The first and second beast,
or the beast and the false prophet-The secular and eccle-
siastical monarchy, of Anti-Christ, or Mahomet-Ecclesiasti-
cal power subject to the civil power in the West, but
not in the East; there it is all in all-Hence a decisive and
unanswerable proof of the SCHEME of prophecy-Repre-
sentation of the beast in the xiiith of the Apocalypse, taken
from the history of the golden image in the 2nd of Daniel,
and xivth of Isaiah-Antichrist the mystical and true king of
Babylon-The pretended living image of God-The beast be-
fore the deadly wound-And the revived beast-The Saracen
and the Turkish empires-The noisome and grievous sore-

CONTENTS.

SECTION I. P. 1.

GENERAL NATURE AND OBJECT OF PROPHECY.

Interpretation impeded by speculations of futurity, and by party
zeal-The entire or the whole Christ-The head and the
members-The same church throughout all ages-The object
and the end of prophecy-The ancient prophecies interpreted
to strengthen the evidences of religion-Not so the latter,
but rather to divide the church and to discredit the profession
of her faith, and to increase the objections of infidels-Lord
Clarendon's remark-Inconsistency of Bishop Hurd-Grotius,
Zanchius, and almost all our earliest and best divines, until
the Usurpation, opposed to controversial interpretation of pro-
phecy-Archbishop Sheldon-Turned against the Trinity-
The Protestant churches injured by misapplying the prophe-
cies-Infidelity encouraged-Dr. Jortin's distinction-The
Reformation not the object of prophecy, but the catholic faith
and catholic church-Two prophetic periods-How distin-
guished—Not by place or date-Same subjects reverted to in
the Apocalypse-Given through more than one person, who
themselves required and obtained clearer discoveries-St.
Augustine-Periods how distinguished-The church the ob-
ject of prophecy-Why the second period the more important
-The truth for which Christ suffered―The resurrection and
glory of Christ-The faith and profession of the church-
The mystery of godliness, to which is opposed the mystery of
iniquity-Prophecy the armour and champion of the church

« السابقةمتابعة »