صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني
[blocks in formation]

IS IT A VALID OBJECTION TO THE TRUTH OF
REVELATION THAT IT HAS NOT BEEN

UNIVERSAL?

PART I.

BY THE REV. PETER CURror,

Minister of St. Martin's.

PRICE 1d.

destroyed if one or other of two things were true. If they were mistaken in their estimate of this individual's character; if he were ascertained to have previously performed actions as dishonest as this, or if it was discovered that there was no dishonesty in the action after all, that though it had worn this aspect at first sight, on closer examination all had turned out to be fair and honourable; in either It has often been alleged by those who have taken case their conclusion that the act in question could the side of infidelity, that if a revelation was to be not be performed by the specified individual, would given, as all stood in need of it, all should be proved groundless. Another case may be taken. have been favoured with it; that it should have It is reported of an individual, who has the credit been uttered in tones which every ear might hear, of an upright and benevolent character, that he had or written in the sky in characters which every bestowed all his wealth on one of a dozen of his eve might read. They have held that there is kindred, who all stood in the same relationship to injustice in shedding its light only on some favoured him, and whose claims upon him, therefore, were spots, and leaving darkness lying thick and unrelieved all equally strong. Some who know his character, on all other regions; that this is the tyranny of think such conduct inconsistent with it, as well as a capricious despot, not the act of a beneficent unjust in itself, and refuse their belief that he could sovereign. And they have run into the conclusion, have done anything of the kind. Now they might that all this being unlike the character of a right-be convinced that their reasoning, and the unbelief eous God, a dispensation so partial and capricious in the distribution of its privileges cannot have come from him.

Now, we do not dispute the facts on which this argument rests. This revelation was long in the hands only of a single nation, and however bright and promising may be its present prospects, it does not yet embrace above a sixth part of the human family. But though this is true, it does not follow that the argument raised on it is sound; a tottering fabric may be reared on a rock. To render an argument valid two things are necessary; the premises, as logicians speak, must be true, and the conclusion to which the argument conducts us must be legitimately drawn. If there is a flaw in either the one or the other, the whole argument is worthless. To make this plain we shall give a case. A particular action has been performed; it is ascribed to a particular individual, but it is maintained by those who profess to know this individual, that it is so unlike his character that they instantly conclude that it cannot have been performed by him. If it is an act of forgery or theft, they may be so thoroughly convinced of his honesty, that without listening to the evidence, they spring to the conviction that it was not, and could not be committed by him. Now this reasoning would be VOL. II.

in which it resulted were both without foundation, on our satisfying them that there was no injustice in the act itself, that none of them had any claim upon him, no right to look for any thing from him but what proceeded from his good will, and that no injustice would have been done, whether he had divided it equally among them, withheld it from the whole of them, or given it all to one. Or their reasoning would be alike shown to be unsound, if we proved to them that this individual had been previously in the habit of acting in the same capricious way in bestowing his favours, choosing rather to give great largesses to one or two, than to give smaller gifts to a greater number. Either of these proofs would manifest the groundlessness of the objection that such an act could not be performed by such an individual.

In like manner, the objection to revelation, that it has not been universal, and could not, therefore, have come from God, will be destroyed if one or other of two things are true. If it shall turn out that there is no injustice in that feature of revelation which they specify as unjust, it is manifest that from that feature no conclusion can be drawn that this revelation could not have come from a God of justice. Or if there are other actions from the hand of God, acknowledged on

all sides, even by the objectors, to be his, which | bestowed. We do not know what influence are of the same character with the one specified, and bearing equally the marks of apparent injustice, it is again alike manifest, that the character of that feature of revelation-its apparent injustice furnishes no argument against its having proceeded from God.

First, then, is there any injustice in communicating a revelation to some and not to all? Injustice is committed only when some rights are violated. Are there any rights violated here? Is there anything withheld from us which we had a right to receive? If there is, then may we complain of being aggrieved; if there is not, no such complaint can honestly be made. Revelation furnishes a remedy for evils which we had brought upon ourselves. Had justice been only left to take its course, these evils, in all their bitterness, we should have had to abide. It is of favour altogether that justice has been arrested in her career of vengeance, that that vengeance did not sweep over every son and daughter of the human family. And he who bestows anything of favour may, without any violation of justice, select the objects on which he bestows it, make them as few or as numerous as he pleases, and bestow it upon them in any amount which he pleases. If a man has an inheritance to bequeath, if there are a dozen standing to him in the same relationship, he may desire to keep it entire, and may bestow it wholly on one. The others might, no doubt, regret that they were not the objects of his choice, but they would never think of alleging that he had done them an act of injustice. If a hundred men have united in rebellion against the state, if their crime has been clearly proved, sentence of death passed on them, and the hour fixed for their execution, the king, while resolved to uphold the authority of the law, might have a disposition of mercy that was melting over so wholesale an execution, and might pardon twenty, thirty, fifty, or more of them. This would be an act of mere favour; and those on whom justice took its course might regret that they were not its selected objects, but they would never think of charging their sovereign with injustice. Our situation is similar. We had all broken a law, whose penalty was death. Its condemnation righteously rested on every human head. No injustice would have been done us though its vengeance had been discharged on every member of the human family. What there would have been no injustice in inflicting on all, there is no injustice in inflicting on a part. It is of mere favour that any are rescued from this condemnation. Where

all is of favour no rights are infringed. Those who are left to abide their punishment are no worse than they would have been had no interference of mercy been made. No injustice is done to them. And there is nothing, therefore, in such an interference unworthy of the character of a just and righteous God.

But it may, for any thing we know, be only a question of the degree in which the favour is

flows from redemption to those to whom it has not been made known. We know that, in one respect, they, in common with the whole race, are sharers in its benefits. They are now in a state of reprieve, which redemption alone has purchased for them. They are indebted to it for many forfeited enjoyments still reserved to them. The sun still shines upon them; the earth still vegetates for them; their food is still pleasing, and not bitter to their taste; the air which they breathe is still the breath of life, and not the pestilential minister of death; they have still the enjoyment which is wrought off by the healthful play of all their organs; they have still the delight which circulates through the channels of family affection, along the links of kindred and the ties of friendship; they have the joys of companionship, and they have the varied pleasures of intellectual occupation. All these were forfeited by transgression, but through the influence of redemption they are still reserved. And since its benefits reach them in this life, it may also, for any thing we know, ameliorate in some degree their condition in the next. It may soften the stroke of their vengeance; it may reserve for them some lingering rills of enjoyment. All the denunciations of vengeance in the Bible, are addressed to those to whom salvation has been offered, and by whom it has been rejected. The Jews were within reach of salvation, while yet the plan of redemption was unknown to them. The prayers and alms of Cornelius were accepted before the Gospel had been preached to him. The bare supposition, that the scheme of redemption may pour some ameliorating ingredients into their eternal cup, is enough to repel an objection resting on so unsubstantial a basis as that which we are now considering. And if it in any measure does so, the consequence would then be, either that the objection is groundless, or that God is bound to bestow equal degrees of enjoyment, of knowledge, and of intelligence upon all his creatures. Either the objection is groundless, or there was injustice in creating angels with higher intelligence than man, in creating one man with higher intelligence than another, in bestowing a loftier intellect on Newton and Milton than on the humblest ploughman or artizan, or a cry might be raised from the whole races beneath us, that they were not gifted with the intelligence of This we presume no one will maintain; but no one who is not prepared to maintain it, can consistently urge it as an objection to revelation, that it has not been universal.

man.

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF

THE LATE REV. ANDREW THOMSON, D.D., Minister of St. George's Parish, Edinburgh. THE name of this eminent servant of Christ is still fresh, we doubt not, in the recollection of our readers. From his splendid and varied talents, and unceasing energy, faithfulness and zeal in the discharge of his important and manifold duties, he was enabled to render essential service, not only to the Church of which he

was so bright an ornament, but to the interests of Christianity in general; and though upwards of six years have passed away since his voice was for ever silenced by death, his memory is now, and long will continue to be held in sweet and grateful remembrance. The high place which during life he occupied in the estimation of the religious community of Scotland, shewed him to have been a man of more than ordinary attainments and usefulness, while the deep and thrilling sensation produced throughout the land by his sudden and unexpected removal, proclaimed in language not to be mistaken, that a "Master in Israel" had fallen. But while the death of such a man, and at such a period, was justly to be regarded as a public calamity, it must not be forgotten that our loss has been his gain; and that though he has laid down the weapons of his spiritual warfare, he has in their place taken up the palm of victory, and received the crown of glory.

In preparing the following imperfect sketch of the life of this distinguished individual, we have been considerably indebted to the short, but excellent, Memoir prefixed to the posthumous volume of his Sermons and Sacramental Exhortations.

Dr Andrew Thomson was born on the 11th July 1779, at Sanquhar, in Dumfries-shire, of which parish his father, the late Reverend Dr John Thomson of Edinburgh, was at that time minister. Little is as yet publicly known regarding his early history, but it appears that without affording any striking proof of premature talent, he was distinguished in his younger days for intelligence and vivacity, and for that open-hearted and manly character by which, in after life, he was so remarkably characterised.

After going through the usual course of classical and theological study, he was, in the beginning of the year 1802, licensed to preach the Gospel by the Presbytery of Kelso; and having soon after received a presentation to Sprouston, in Roxburghshire, he was ordained on the 11th of March following, and immediately commenced his ministerial labours in that parish. He was soon after married to Miss Jane Carmichael, his union with whom was productive of great happiness and do*mestic comfort, and was interrupted only by the lamented event, which if it excited such universal regret abroad, must have shed a peculiarly dark and desolating gloom over the joys and prospects of an affectionate family.

Dr Thomson's ministry, during his incumbency at Sprouston, was characterised by the same faithfulness which marked his subsequent labours. The Catechism on the Lord's Supper, which he published at that time for the use of the young people in his parish, has been of great service to many besides those for whom it was originally intended; and as a proof of the general estimation in which it is held, it may be mentioned, that it has passed through upwards of thirty editions, and more than one hundred and forty thousand copies of it have been sold. Besides devoting unremitting attention to the immediate duties of his parish, he also began at this early period to take an active part in the important business of the Church Courts.

After remaining for a period of about six years at Sprouston, he received a presentation to the East Church, Perth, to which he removed in the year 1808, and there his ministry was equally acceptable as in his former charge. It was not long, however, before, his talents becoming more extensively known, he was promoted to the vacant charge of the New Greyfriars Church, in the city of Edinburgh. On commencing, in the spring of 1810, his stated labours in this important situation, he made a most favourable impression on the minds of his hearers. Many who were attracted by the brilliancy of his talents and the eloquence of his preaching, became regular attendants on his ministry, and not a few owe their earliest religious impressions

to the sound, practical, and efficient instructions, which they were at this time privileged to receive from him, The peculiar doctrines of Christianity which he saw it his duty to bring most prominently forward in his discourses, were not at that period so generally acceptable as at present; but it is almost needless to state, that these doctrines were laid before his hearers with all that candour and faithfulness by which he was ever distinguished, Indeed, no feature in his character was more strongly developed than his aversion to any improper compromise or concealment; and though this circumstance was occasionally, in controversy, productive of consequences by no means agreeable to himself, he was thereby often enabled to render eminent service to the cause of truth, while others shrunk back from the unpleasant but salutary duty.

St. George's Church, which had been for some years building, having been opened for public worship in the month of June 1814, Dr Thomson was selected by the Magistrates and Town Council as the most suitable minister for so influential and important a station. The difficulties to be encountered in collecting and retaining a large congregation in this new sphere of usefulness, situated as it then was at the extremity of the city, were not few. His was a mind, however, not to be discouraged, but rather stimulated to exertion by difficulty. And while he at once devoted all the energies of his powerful mind to the discharge of his multifarious duties, he soon had the satisfaction of finding the pleasure of the Lord prospering in his hands, and of seeing his labours crowned with abundant success. The congregation by whom he began to be surrounded, was of the highest respectability, and to many of them he was enabled, under the blessing of God, to be of great spiritual service. The respect shewn to him by his people was gratifying in the highest degree, and over them he soon acquired an influence scarcely ever possessed by any preacher. "Nor," says the author of the Memoir, "is it necessary to say, that he owed this enviable ascendancy to no compromise of principle,-to no unworthy accommodation of divine truth to the prejudices of his audience. In addressing himself to a congregation peculiarly exclusive and sensitive, he stood upon the high ground of his office as an ambassador for Christ; and with the apostle of the Gentiles, to whose bold unfearing character his own, in many points, bore a striking resemblance, he determined to know nothing, as the subject of his ministry, but Jesus Christ, and him crucified. How fully, effectively, and perseveringly he adhered to his system, the recollection of his hearers, as well as the strain of his published discourses, amply testify. The peculiar qualifications which he brought to his task are, at the same time, not to be overlooked. To a manner of great animation and fire, yet restrained and dignified, he added a style of uncommon simplicity and spirit, which nature enabled him to set off to advantage by the tones of a voice remarkable for compass and harmony. He delighted in argument, but his arguments were of that direct, palpable, practical character which stimulate attention, and admit of being appreciated and followed by the most ordinary understanding; while the truths he laboured to esta blish were all of acknowledged importance, bore so intimate a relation to the system which, as a Christian minister, it was his province to illustrate and enforce, and came so closely and powerfully home to every man's heart and conscience, that nothing could appear more natural than the pains he took to explain and defend them. As in the clear fountain of his thoughts, there were no turbid elements, no confusion of ideas, no obscure images, no surface on which a wayward fancy could paint the fluctuating figures of its own changeful extravagance; so, in his discourses, all was simple, perspicuous, unaffected, and intelligible. Imagination was not, perhaps, bis distinctive faculty; yet

approved psalm tunes, all of which he carefully revised, and added several original compositions, and a few of his own of great beauty. The improvement which within these few years has taken place in this part of public worship, in many of the congregations in Edinburgh, and throughout the country, may, in no small degree, be ascribed to the unremitting exertions made by him in this respect.

even of the glow and peculiar effect of a well disciplin- | of the sanctuary. He drew up a collection of the most ed imagination, his compositions were not destitute. When he chose, be could be tender, descriptive, and impassioned, and when he indulged neither in declamation addressed to the fancy, nor in appeals which went to the heart, he uniformly commanded attention by the clearness of his statements, the force of his reasonings, and the pointed and practical strain of his exhortations. It has been well remarked of him, that few men, and especially few public instructors, ever Though Dr Thomson appeared to great advantage displayed a greater acquaintance with human nature, in the pulpit, those who knew him best, perhaps ador could turn their knowledge to better account. His mired him even more in the private ministrations of his hearers accordingly, however secular their habits, could parish. In every house which he entered he was received not but feel that they were addressed by one intimately with a hearty welcome, and when he departed he car conversant with life and manners; they could not evade ried with him the good wishes of all. But more espethe force of his arguments and lessons, by ascribing cially in seasons of domestic distress his presence was them to the ignorance or austerity of their instructor; found to be peculiarly useful and acceptable. While they could not but perceive in his delineations of char- with the utmost sympathy and tenderness he poured acter, a faithful mirror, in which their own modes of the words of consolation into the ear of the disconsothinking and acting were exhibited to the life; nor late and afflicted, he, at the same time, was enabled, in could they be insensible to the value of warnings and a singularly happy manner, to superadd such spiritual of counsels, in which the acuteness of the man of libe- instruction and admonition as he thought necessary. ral ideas and of general observations, was blended with His well-timed addresses at these seasons have been the wisdom of the moralist, and the sanctity of the productive to many families not only of comfort but of Christian and the Divine. To causes such as these, great and lasting benefit. Numerous also were the accordingly, we are to ascribe the high place which Dr chambers of death which he was called to visit, and Thomson acquired and held in the estimation of the when neither the world nor its enjoyments have been religious public of Edinburgh. Nor, in any review of able to yield the slightest peace of mind in the prosthe religious history of the period, will the deserved pect of dissolution, his voice has often been heard amid fame of Dr Thomson be overlooked, as one of the the sorrows of these dark and trying scenes, rising becauses of the revived taste for the faithful preaching fore the throne of God in accents of the deepest tenof the Gospel, which has happily characterised Edin- derness, leading away the soul from all earthly refuges, burgh for the last fifteen or twenty years.' and commending it to the mercies of an all-sufficient and compassionate Saviour.

"

By the young people of his congregation he was more than usually beloved, and their affection was responded to on his part by the most laborious and diligent exertions for their spiritual improvement. Many of them still bear in mind the affectionate addresses, and sound and wholesome advices which, from time to time, they received from him, both publicly and in private, and look back with melancholy satisfaction on those pleasant hours which, in Sunday classes and week-day meetings, he so unremittingly devoted to their spiritual

instruction.

With the assistance of some friends, Dr Thomson had commenced, in the month of August 1810, the publication of the Edinburgh Christian Instructor. Of this periodical he continued, for the twenty years which elapsed from its establishment till the time of his death, its only and unassisted editor, except on occasions when necessarily absent from town. The amount of labour which he thus voluntarily undertook was very great, and it is known that he spent many an almost sleepless night in making the necessary preparations for its publication. In the course of his career both as an editor and a minister of the Gospel, Dr Thomson found himself often reluctantly dragged into controversies which occasionally exposed him to calumny and reproach. To use the language of Dr M'Crie, who has also since gone to his eternal rest, "he was not exposed to the woe denounced against those of whom all men speak well. He had his detractors and enemies, who waited for his halting, and were prepared to magnify and blazon his faults.' Of him it may be said, as of another Christian patriot, no man ever loved or hated him moderately. This was the inevitable consequence of his great talents, and the rough contests in which he was involved. His generous spirit raised him above the indulgence of envy and every jealous feeling, but it made him less tolerant of those who displayed these mean vices. When convinced of the justice of a cause, and satisfied of its magnitude, he threw his whole soul into it, summoned all his powers to its defence, and assailed its adversaries, not only with strong arguments, but with sharp, pointed, and poignant sarcasm; but unless he perceived insincerity, malignity, or perverse

But these labours among the young were not confined to the congregation. He soon found there were many in the parish whom his Sabbath ministrations could not reach, either from their not attending Church, or requiring more instruction than could be given them on that day. To meet their case, he collected funds for the erection of a school in Young Street, where the children of the poorer classes of his parishioners might receive the elementary principles of education and religion at a cheap rate. To this school it was Dr Thomson's practice to devote entire days of his valuable time, and, till a teacher was trained by himself, and qualified to follow out efficiently his own plans of instruction, he regularly attended at nine o'clock every morning, and commenced his self-imposed but laborious task. In no circumstances, perhaps, did he appear more truly great than when thus unostentatiously engaged in these labours of love; and so completely did he accommodate himself to the understandings of the children, that instead of being awe-struck in his presence, they seemed apparently as happy under his instructions as when engaged in their innocent amusements. For the use of the children attending this school, he preparedness, his own feelings were too acute and too just to perseveral excellent manuals of education, one of which, "Collection" for the highest class, contains many original compositions, and is justly held in very high estimation. It is known to many that Dr Thomson took also a great interest in the improvement of the psalmody of the congregation of St. George's. Possessed of a fine ear and taste for music, he was well qualified to effect a salutary change in this important part of the services

mit him, gratuitously, to wound those of others. That his zeal was always reined by prudence; that his ardour of mind never hurried him to a precipitate conclusion, or led him to magnify the subject in debate, that his mind was never warped by party feeling; and that he never indulged the love of victory, or sought to humble a teazing or pragmatic adversary, are positions which his true friends will not maintain. But his ablest

'opponents will admit, that in all the great questions in which he distinguished himself, he acted conscientiously; that he was an open, manly, and honourable adversary; and that though he was sometimes intemperate, he was never disingenuous. Dr Thomson was by constitution a reformer; he felt a strong sympathy with those great men who, in a former age, won renown, by assailing the hydra of error; and of civil and religious tyranny, and his character partook of theirs. In particular, he bore no inconsiderable resemblance to Luther, both in excellencies and defects; his leonine nobleness and potency, his masculine eloquence, his facetiousness and pleasantry, the fondness which he shewed for the fascinating charms of music, and the irritability and vehemence which he occasionally exhibited, to which some will add the necessity which this imposed on him to make retractions, which, while they threw a partial shade over his fame, taught his admirers the needful lesson, that he was a man subject to like passions and infirmities with others. But the fact is, though hitherto known to few, and the time has now come for revealing it, that some of those effusions which were most objectionable, and exposed him to the greatest obloquy, were neither composed by Dr Thomson, nor seen by him, until they were published to the world; and that in one instance, which has given rise to the most unsparing abuse, he paid the expenses of a prosecution, and submitted to make a public apology, for an offence of which he was innocent as the child unborn, rather than give up the name of the friend who was morally responsible for the deed;—an example of generous self-devotion which has few parallel-."

|

acquainted with the circumstances of the case, that the practice complained of called most loudly for redress, and that the great principles maintained in this controversy, on his part, had for their only object the preservation and purity of the Word of God without mixture, diminution, or addition.

The discourses which Dr Thomson delivered, and afterwards published, the winter preceding his death, on the doctrine of "Universal Pardon," were highly seasonable and useful at the time, and contain a triumphant refutation of the errors they are intended to expose. These discourses are regarded by many as the best specimen of the diversified talents of their author; and certainly display his ability to great advantage, not only as an acute reasoner, but as a profound theologian and Scripture critic.

The leading part which he took, in regard to the im. portant subject of the abolition of negro slavery, must not be passed over without notice. This was the last public question to which he devoted the energies of his powerful and versatile mind. With characteristic boldness and magnanimity he set his face against all partial measures for the improvement of this system of bodily and mental oppression, and in the midst of much opposition, stood fearlessly forward, the avowed, determined, and able advocate of immediate emancipation.

A meeting of the Anti-Slavery Society having been held in the month of October 1830, Dr Thomson attended, and after Mr Jeffrey (now promoted to the bench) and other speakers had addressed the meeting, and stated their views as to the proper time for abolition, he rose from the centre of the room, and craved permission to explain the conclusions at which he had arrived. "With a power of argument, and an earnest

he entered on the subject; and in a brief speech, explained the points in which he differed from the former speakers, as well as those in which he agreed with them. Never was the triumph of truth and eloquence more complete. Before he had concluded, the majority of the meeting was with him: the confidence of the directors of the society in the measures they had come forward to recommend, was shaken; and, in the rapturous acclamations of a crowded assembly, he had the satisfaction of listening to the first echo, which Great Britain, through all her provinces, has since sent back, to the call of justice and religion, in behalf of the injured children of her colonies."

Dr Thomson at all times took an interest in the business of many of the public charities and societies connected with Edinburgh. He was never unwillingness and elevation of tone which can never be forgotten, to give his powerful assistance, either in aiding in their management, or pleading their cause from the pulpit. It is indeed matter of surprise how he found time for the multifarious duties which he was, in this and other respects, called to perform, no less than of admiration at the apparent ease and cheerfulness with which he went through them all. Superadded to his other labours, must, in particular, be mentioned the leading part which he took in the business of the ecclesiastical courts. In these courts, indeed, he was for many years preceding his death, acknowledged as the leader of the party to which he was, from principle, attached. The amount of personal labour and anxiety which was thus devolved upon him it would not be easy to estimate, and few men, it is believed, could have so long sustained the unceasing demands which, in addition to his other duties, were thus made on his time and exertions. He was, however, admirably qualified to occupy such an important and commanding station. Not only was be well acquainted with the laws of the Church, and the different forms requisite in conducting business, but for ability and readiness in debate he stood almost unrivalled. Many will recollect the bursts of eloquence which they have heard from his lips in the General Assembly, and the ability, dignity, and ease with which, even on the spur of the moment, he could reply to the arguments of an opponent. The important objects which he often had in view were, no doubt, sometimes thwarted by large majorities, but his intrepidity and fortitude never forsook him, and want of success only produced in him redoubled exertion.

This is not the place, nor have we any wish to enter on the protracted discussion to which the proceedings of the directors of the British and Foreign Bible Society, regarding the circulation of the Apocrypha, unfortunately gave rise, and in which Dr Thomson took so prominent a part. While, however, some of the consequences which ensued from these discussions were deeply regretted, and by none more than Dr Thomson himself, it will be admitted by every unprejudiced mind, at all

At a subsequent meeting of the friends of immediate abolition, Dr Thomson attended along with the directors of the Anti-Slavery Society, who now almost unanimously coincided in his views. The speech which he delivered on that occasion was perhaps the most splendid effort of his genius, abounding in high and elevated feeling, and carrying conviction irresistibly home to the understanding and the heart. Rarely have we witnessed such unequivocal symptoms of admiration and enthusiasm, as this brilliant effusion of his eloquence produced on the densely crowded meeting assembled on the occasion. The concluding paragraph of his address is so beautiful and so characteristic of the determined views which he entertained on this great question, that we cannot resist recalling it to the recollection of our readers:-"If," said he, "there must be violence, let it even come, for it will soon pass away-let it come, and rage its little hour, since it is to be succeeded by lasting freedom, and prosperity, and happiness. Give me the hurricane rather than the pestilence. Give me the hurricane, with its thunder, and its lightning, and its tempest;-give me the hurricane, with its partial and temporary devastations, awful though they be ;give me the hurricane, with its purifying, healthful, salutary effects;-give me that hurricane, infinitely rather than the noisome pestilence, whose path is never crossed, whose silence is dever disturbed, whose pro

« السابقةمتابعة »